标题: 南京大学1996-2000国际经济法试题 [打印本页] 作者: benben5520 时间: 07-5-15 14:58 标题: 南京大学1996-2000国际经济法试题 96
一.名词解释
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则.
注册资本
二.论述题
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容
三.案例题(中文回答)
INTRODUCTION
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles
of international trade law to support your argument
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed
back an acceptance.
Questions:
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per
ton to USD 2,500 per ton?
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer?
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication.
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of
China and international practice
Questions:
1)What is the main issue in this case?
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve
the dispute?
2In April 1986,X,a Chinesee Radio Component Factory signed a contract in Beij
ing with Y,a US company for a capaciton production line worth 17 million yuan.
The equipment was to have been delivered before April 30,1987.but it did not
arrive even by September that year.The contract set out a penalty of one per
cent of the line value as compensation if the equipment was one to nine weeks
overdue.Another agreement was signed by the two parties in Octorber 1987 and
stipulated delivery by the end of December 1987,but it did not specify claims.
The equipment finally arrived in March 1988 i.e. eleven months late.Inspection
shows that 30 of the 113 imported pieces equipment were found to be second hand
.Some were useless.The defect caused losses of 2.44 million yuan.Supplementary
agreement signed in May required the US company to replace the defective par-
ts of equipment before the end of October 1988.But to-date,none has arrived.
All this caused X,thefactory in Beijing a total loss of 3.7 million yuan.X t
hen filed a suit against Y in the people\'s Court for compensation of all the
losses.
Qestions:
1)Sice Y is an absent defendant residing outside the Chinese territory,in view of the principle\"the plaintiff follows the forum of the defendant\"incorporated in Chinese procedure law,does the People\'s Court have jurisdiction over such a
case ?Why?
2)What is the proper law lf the contract to be applied the People\'Court,as there is no express choice of law provision in the contract?And why ?作者: benben5520 时间: 07-5-15 15:01 标题: 99 一.名词解释
根本违反合同.风险转移.国际投资法.TRIMS.国家契约.投资总额.国际货币
二.论述题
1.试述涉外经济法与国际经济法的关系
2.简述外商投资股份有限公司的基本含义与法律特征
3.简要说明信用证的定义,依据及法律关系
4.何谓国际技术贸易中的限制性条款,其法律地位如何
三。案例题
1.我国某出口公司A(以下简称\"中国A公司\")按CIF合同条件向欧洲某国进口商B(以下简称
\"外国B公司\")出口一批草编制品,并向中国人保公司投保了一切险,同时规定以信用证的
方式支付.中国A公司在合同规定的期限和指定的中国某港口装船完毕,取得了船公司签发
的提单,然后去中国银行议付了款项.几天后,中国A公司接到外国B公司来电,来电称:因装
货海轮在运输途中失火,草编制品全部被烧毁,外国B公司要求中国A公司向中国人保公司
提出索赔,否则要求中国A公司退出全部货款.请回答:
1)何谓CIF合同条件
2)对外国B公司的要求.中国A公司应如何处理.为什么
2.新加坡A商行于5月10日来电向中国B公司发盘出售木材一批.发盘中列明各项必要条件
.但未规定有效期.B公司于当天收到来电,经研究后,5月12日上午11时向当地电报局交发
对以上发盘表示接受的电报.该电报于同日下午2时送达新加坡A商行.在此期间,因木材价
格上涨,新加坡A商行于5月12日上午8时20分向当地电报局交发电报,电文如下:\"由于木材
价格上涨,我方5月10日来电发盘撤消.\"该电报于同日上午11点20分送达中国B公司,试问:
1)根据有关国际贸易的法律,新加坡A商行是否已成功的撤消了5月10日的发盘.为什么
2)新加坡A商行与中国B公司之间是否已成立了合同,为什么作者: benben5520 时间: 07-5-15 15:02 标题: 2000 一.名词解释
TRIMS.投资保护协定.外商投资股份有限公司.股权式合营企业.\"根本违反合同\"
适航责任.国际许可证协议.替代国制度
二.论述题
1.根据我国法律规定,简要说明外商投资企业在我国取得土地使用权的主要方式及其不用特点
2.简述国际货币基金组织的法律地位和国际货币基金协定的基本原则
3.<1990年国际贸易术语解释通则>的主要特点是什么
4.试述关税在GATT中的法律地位
三。案例题
INTRODUCTION
Aswer in Chinese the following questions after you read the cases.You must a
nswer them precisely to the point.Put forward the various basic principles o
f the laws to support your argument.
Case 1
In June 1990, a Chinese trading company concluded a joint venture contract w
ith a foreign industrial company.Under the contract,the two parties woukd mak
e joint investment to establish Grant Hotel of New Century with the
total investment of USDTen million and registered capital of USD five milli
on.Each party must contribute 50% of registered capital.
After the approval of joint venture contract,the Chinese party performed the
obligation of contributing capital.However,the foreign side failed to contr
ibute any capital by the end of December.When the construction of major buil
ding of hotel was completed in Augest 1991,the foreign party remained failur
e to contribute capital,which resulted in the great loss of the Chinese canc
ellation of the joint venture contract.At the same time,the Chinese side sugb
mitted the disp
ute to the arbitration body in Beijing according to the arbitration clause i
n the contract,claiming for damages from the foreign side.
Question:
1)Did the Chinese company have the right to cancel the joint venture contrac
t/Why?
2)How to deal with the dispute concerning the loss or damage?(Suppose you we
re an arbitrator of the arbitration body,please give your opinion to the cas
e)
Case 2
A Chinese company and a Hong Kong company reached a joint venture agreement
to establish a hotel at the end of 1989 in China.The total investment contri
buted ty the two parties equaled $2 million and each party ,respectively,sha
red 50% equity of the joint venture,In July 1990,the Hong Kong company declar
ed bankruptcy in Hong Kong.Later,the Hong Kong c
ompany entered into a new agreement with the third party for assignment(tran
sferring)of its equity of the joint venture to the latter so as to repay a d
ebt from the assignment.The assignment agreement was submitted to the local
government for approval.Having discovered what had happened,the Chinese comp
any requested the Hong Kong company to cancel the assignment agreement and pr
oposed to receive the Hong Kong party\'s equity in the same conditions.
After such request and proposal were refused by the Hong Kong company,the Ch
inese company filed a lawsuit against the Hong Kong company.
Questions:
1)Was the said assignment agreement effective under Chinese law?Why?
2)What was the right of the Chinese party in the matter of Hong Kong party\'s
equity assignment under Chinese law?作者: jsnjxyy 时间: 07-5-23 10:23
谢谢[s:2]作者: coolboy1110 时间: 07-6-23 20:00
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽作者: huangful 时间: 07-7-22 20:26
谢谢 楼主作者: 19870719 时间: 07-8-28 10:29
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽