1 New sources of energy must be found, and this will take time, but it is not likely to result in any situation that will ever restore that sense of cheap and plentiful energy we have had in the times past.
we have had in the times past这个从句修饰的先行词是sense 还是 energy ?
必须找到新的能源，这需要时间；而过去我们感觉到的那种能源价廉而充足的情况将不可能再出现了
2This will be particularly true since energy pinch will make it difficult to continue agriculture in the high-energy American fashion that makes it possible to combine few farmers with high yields.
that makes it possible to combine few farmers with high yields. 这个从句修饰的先行词是agriculture 还是fashion
答案给出的翻译第一个修饰的是SENSE 第二个修饰的是FASHION
第一个句子是sense of cheap and plentiful energy 有OF 第2个句子是agriculture in the high-energy American fashion
有IN 我对这种从句前面 一个词后面跟着个 in from of 这类的介词然后又跟着一个词 到底从句修饰 介词前面的词还是介词后面的词呢
in the high-energy American fashion （that makes it possible to combine few farmers with high yields）修饰 agriculture
that makes it possible to combine few farmers with high yields 修饰 fashion
那第二个句子 agriculture in the high-energy American fashion that makes it possible to combine few farmers with high yields.
也应该是 that 后面的从句修饰agriculture呀 , ...
in the high-energy American fashion （that makes it possible to combine few farmers with high yields）修饰 agriculture
that makes it possible to combine few farmers with high yields 修饰 fashion
原帖由 sudapapa 于 2009-8-22 00:01 发表
就分析一下第一句吧……
New sources of energy must be found, and this will take time，|but it is not likely to result in any situation that will ever restore that sense of cheap and plentiful ene ...
谢谢你的解答[s:7]
不过我想问的是 最后那一个从句,也就是括号里的 sense of cheap and plentiful energy( we have had in the times past) 为什么是修饰sense 而不是energy
收藏
点赞!
反对!
我说语感会不会被劈啊，因为我一般都是先找关键词之后再分析其他结构的
楼主