考研的同学仔细认真地看看这篇文章，这是我转的一位牛人的帖子，里面的东西80%以上讲的相当相当有道理。文章很长，慢慢看，肯定会有收获。
如何在四个月内将考研英语成绩切实提高20分（最新版）
如何在四个月内将考研英语成绩切实提高20分。是我们每个人想要通过考研，必须面对都问题。每年都要考生因为英语拖后退而名落孙山的。还有成绩很不稳定，今年考个60，明年考个40的。说明将英语水平保证在60以上，确实是个问题。
下面将从复习选择资料谈到阅读方法，以2005-2009年真题为例。
一、必备的书（适用于一战的选手）：
1、《考研英语大纲》，法硕指南配套的大纲可以不买，但英语大纲必须买。因为上面有需要掌握都单词列表。
2、朱泰奇的英语复习指南。他每年就那一本，除了把刚考过的题付在后面外，就剩书皮要换个新的了。但这本书对考研涉及的单词和词组总结的特别全面，对巩固基础很有帮助。
3、石春桢的阅读220篇。这是我见过和考研阅读真题难度最接近的一本书了。可能还略微难一点，用来练阅读在好不过。有些人反映他都阅读朝纲都词汇太多，但2009年都真题不是朝纲都词汇更多吗？
4、张剑和曾鸣编著都历年考研英语（试卷版）真题解析及复习思路。我见过的最好的真题汇编，后面有详细的解释，而且有每道题的难度和区分度，可以让你弄清楚是否是必错的题。大家都错的话，不需要去过多研究，只能说明题出的不好。特别是那种难度和区分度都在0.01以下的。这种题说明出题老师都无能。此外，一定要选择试卷版，因为最象卷子，有模拟的感觉。
5、若干的模拟题。做模拟题其实是很无奈的一件事。模拟做的再多还是模拟，永远不可能跟真题的难度一样，何况现在市面上出的模拟题质量一点都不好。但我劝你还是买至少一本吧，把上面的题认认真真的做了。虽然它很烂，但是还是可以让你知道哪里是你的薄弱环节。只要它起到这样的作用也就行了。这里强调买模拟题的应该注意的几点：首先看看后面有没有详细的答案，阅读题的答案应该告诉你文中对应的地方是那里，语法应该讲解语法现象，作文最好还有范文。其次看看阅读每段的长度够不够，这点很重要。有些粗制滥造的题长度明显太短，做完后让你自信心膨胀，有虚假的胜利感，并会给你带来最后的痛苦。
书就推荐这么多，还有两本不错的书可以考虑：一本是跟大纲配套的大纲详解，它里面可以看出出题的方向，对理解题意有好处。不过政治的效果更好一些。另一本是宫东风出的《考研英语词汇复习指南》。此外，最重要的是买本词组的背诵书，切记。虽然不直接考察词组，但多看词组有一个好处，可以培养你意群的意识，看阅读的时候可以一目十行，有效提高阅读的速度。
二、复习当中应该注重的总原则和要搞清的几个问题。
总原则一：英语能力的培养是慢功夫，不可能一促而就。所以每天都要看英语，每天都要作题。强调这点是必要的，因为很多人做不到这点。经常是三天打鱼两天晒网。
总原则二：记住考研英语很BT，从1999-2009年，出题难度有非常大的变化。它是那些研究英语的人出的题，不是那些运用英语的人出的题。所以它虽然以英语为基础，但是它考不出你真正的英语水平。所以我们的任务是如何对付这个BT的考不出来我们真实英语水平的题，而不是真正提高我们的英语水平。笔者一直做了从1999年到2009年的十年真题，1999-2004年难度比较稳定，没太大的变化。2005有个非常大都难度提高，2006-2008持下降都趋势。2009年又有大的难度提高。
总原则三：英语就是考阅读。虽然现在增加了新题型、小作文之类的，但是如果一般人阅读拿不到25-30分，英语及格就很困难。并且阅读跟答好其他题型，有着密不可分的关系，所以一定要充分认识到阅读的对取得高分的重要性。
问题1、英语能力和作题的关系。英语能力是作题的基础，基础扎实才能取得高分。基础不好的朋友要敢于面对这个现实，想要短时间内提高英语能力，想要把每个单词都记住是不现实的。我们不要强求自己阅读，翻译，作文水平在4个月里能有长足的提高，我们所能做的仅仅是在在剩下的4个月里所能做的把上面的几本书翻烂，把英语提高20分。我在这里做个保证，上面所列的那几本书对想要考70分左右的朋友足够用了，不用再买杂七杂八的其他书了。
问题2、提高分数的唯一办法是对这个考试做到非常熟悉，想要对考试做到非常熟悉的唯一办法是作题。
问题3、作题要注意几点：①每天做阅读都要卡表看时间，要努力提高速度。刚开始做的时候可能很慢，所以告你个方法，以比自己平常阅读速度稍快的速度阅读。刚开始的时候可能会读不大懂，作题老出错，坚持一段方法就好了。阅读考试正常需要的时间是一个小时，但我最后考试的时候看了一下表，作完才用了半个小时。②每作完一套题之后都要看答案，看看自己错在哪里，为什么做错了。是语法不扎实，还是单词没记住，还是推理有问题。还是掉进出题人都陷阱里了。
问题4、每天除了作题外，需要做的2件事：①背单词。为阅读打基础，每天都要背，以前背的要经常复习。②做阅读，至少4篇。
问题5、请认识到，考研英语跟一个人都英语能力有关，但也关系不大。它都作用就刷下一批人去。因此出题人选材之无聊、晦涩、抽象，出题之恶毒就是这个考试的特点。
三、复习的步骤
就按推荐的书来说。
1、第一个月先把大纲背过一遍。那本大纲翻的黑黑的让你会很有满足感。以后的每个月都要复习单词。要特别强调注意每个单词释意的第二第三个意思。考研很BT，经常考那些不常用的意思。背单词的方法：我是每天看一个字母下的单词A，第二天再背下一个字母B。背完今天的，再重新复习前一天看过的。把昨天背过忘记的划出来。第三天背下下一个字母的，同时看第二天背的，划出忘记的。第四天复习第一天划出的忘的。依次类推。速度很快的，你可以试试。
2、第二个月看朱泰奇的英语复习指南。那本书里面基础总结的很好，按单词词组都做了归纳，要好好看。大致需要一个月的时间。基础好的人可以略过。
3、第三个月做1999-2009年的真题。每套题都要搞懂。真题不多，最好留一套做最后的模拟。特别注意体会出题人心理的变化。
4、第四个月的前20天做石春帧的220篇或模拟题，后10天回归真题。期间要背诵作文模板，切忌一定练习写一下，至少每天一篇。
----真题是根本，出题人心态是根本。其他都是次要的。还有你自己都心态也是重要的，要戒骄戒躁，保持平和。
说明几点：复习步骤不能死搬教条，如果你基础够好的话，或者你已经背过单词了，完全可以直接从第二步开始。这样的话，多一个月的时间可以把真题和石春桢的阅读好好看看。这两本书看两遍都不为过，特别是对一战的来说。
四、注意事项
1、复习后期不要以单词为主，一定要以阅读为主。
2、以摸清出题人心里为主，一两个单词不认识，都是次要都。
3、以提高阅读速度为主，找到较高都阅读速度和正确率之间的平衡点。一般是阅读速度提高，正确率下降。
4、提高阅读速度最重要的是加强对长难句的理解，要注意这不是短时间内可以提高的。对长难句的认识和掌握，要贯穿复习始终。
5、出题人都心里最重要，每个阅读重点不在文章的理解，而在每个选项都比较上。很多人都误区，是花很多时间在文章阅读上，却在很短时间内，随便选一个了事。
五、如何阅读（2005-2009风格比较统一，与2004年以前有大不同，出题思路都不一样）
1、2005年真题阅读
总评价：2005比2004以前的真题，风格和难度都有很大变化，因为第一次引入新题型。
Text 1
Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as “all too human”, with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it all too monkey, as well.
The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food tardily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males. Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnan's and Dr. de waal's; study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its r**came markedly different.
In the world of capuchins grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers) So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to ;accept the slice of cucumber Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (without an actual monkey to eat it) was enough to reduce resentment in a female capuchin.
The researches suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions, in the wild, they are a co-operative, groupliving species, Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people alone, Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems form the common ancestor that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.
21. In the opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic by
A. posing a contrast.
B. justifying an assumption.
C. making a comparison.
D. explaining a phenomenon.
22. The statement “it is all too monkey” (Last line, paragraph l) implies that
A. monkeys are also outraged by slack rivals.
B. resenting unfairness is also monkeys' nature.
C. monkeys, like humans, tend to be jealous of each other.
D. no animals other than monkeys can develop such emotions.
23.Female capuchin monkeys were chosen for the research most probably because they are
A. more inclined to weigh what they get.
B. attentive to researchers' instructions.
C. nice in both appearance and temperament.
D. more generous than their male companions
24.Dr. Brosnan and Dr. de Waal have eventually found in their study that the monkeys
A. prefer grapes to cucumbers.
B. can be taught to exchange things.
C. will not be co-operative if feeling cheated.
D. are unhappy when separated from others.
25. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A. Monkeys can be trained to develop social emotions.
B. Human indignation evolved from an uncertain source.
C. Animals usually show their feelings openly as humans do.
D. Cooperation among monkeys remains stable only in the wild.
阅读方法：先看21-25每道题都题干，注意是题干，不看选择项。这样看都好处是，大致了解文章要谈到什么，可以很快的进入状态。不看选择项的原因，在于只有一个正确选项，其他3个是错误。这三个错误选项还有可能是文章中谈到的。过早看了，可能会形成先入为主，自证自己正确都思维定势。就是说不要受不必要的干扰。
接着，看文章。略读和跳读（scan and skip），注意不是精读。很多人喜欢精读。这也是大学四年考4、6级培养成的习惯。对于考研来说是错误的。我可以确切都说，喜欢精读的人，再怎么提高英语也就是50-60左右的成绩。对于考研英语阅读量大，时间紧，难度大。精读方法不适合。至于如何scan and skip，有时间我再讲。这个有专门都训练方法。
然后回头做题。注意，一般到这一步时，一般是仅仅过了5-7分钟左右时间。剩下时间都要花在回查原文和比较选择项上。看21题，难度是0.246。说明难度挺高（难度分越低，说明越难，做对都人更少）我选了D.因为原文确实提出了一个人类身上发生都现象。但正确答案是C。因为这是文章都主题所在。此外，最后一句BUT，说明是个比较。这就是落入出题人都陷阱里了。
2、2006年真题阅读
总评价：2006比2005难度降低，估计2005年的人考的不好。但完型和翻译挺难，有点象2009.新题型难度不大。
Text 3
Text 3
When prehistoric man arrived in new parts of the world, something strong happened to the large animals; they suddenly became extinct. Smaller species survived, the large, slow-growing animals were easy game, and were quickly hunted to extinction. Now something similar could be happening in the oceans。
That the seas are being over-fished has been known for years what researchers such as Ransom Myers and Boris Worm have shown is just how fast things are changing. They have looked at half a century of data from fisheries around the world. Their methods de not attempt to estimate the actual biomass (the amount of living biological matter) of fish species in particular parts of the ocean, but rather changes in that biomass over time. According to their latest paper published in Nature, the biomass of large predators (animals that kill and eat other animals) inanes fishery is reduced on average by 80% within 15 years of the start of exploitation. In some long-fished areas, it has halved again since then.
Dr. Worm acknowledges that these figures are conservative, one reason for this is that fishing technology has improved Today’s vessels can find their prey using satellites and sonar, which were not available 50 years ago that means a higher proportion of what is in the sea is being caught, so the real difference between present and past is likely to be worse than the one recorded by changes in catch sizes. In the early days, too, longlines would have been more saturated with fish. Some individuals would therefore not have been caught, since to baited hooks would have been available to trap them, leading to an underestimate of fish stocks in the past. Furthermore, in the early days of longline fishing, a lot of fish were lost to sharks after they had been hooked. That is no longer a problem, because there are fewer sharks around noise.
Dr. Myers and Dr. worm argue that their work gives a correct baseline, which future management efforts must take into account. They believe the date support an idea current among marine biologists, that of the “shifting baseline”. The notion is that people have failed to detect the massive changes which have happened in the ocean because they have been looking back only a relatively short time into the past. That matters because theory suggests that the maximum sustainable yield that can be cropped form a fishery comes when the biomass of a target species is about 50% of its original levels. Most fisheries are well below that, which is a bad way to de business.
31、The extinction of large prehistoric animals is noted to suggest that
A、 large animal were vulnerable to the changing environment
B、 small species survived as large animals disappeared
C、 large sea animals may face the same threat today.
D、 Slow-growing fish outlive fast-growing ones
32、who can infer form Dr Myers and Dr. Worm’s paper that
A、 the stock of large predators in some old fisheries has reduced by 90%
B、 there are only half as many fisheries are there were 15 years ago
C、 the catch sizes in new fisheries are only 20% of the original amount
D、 the number of larger predators dropped faster in new fisherish than in the old
33、By saying these figures are conservative (line in ,paragragf-3), Dr worm means that
A、 fishing technology has improved rapidly
B、 then catch-sizes are actually smaller then recorded
C、 the marine bio mass has suffered a greater loss
D、 the date collected so far are pit pf date.
34 、Dr Myers and other researchers hold that
A、people should look for a baseline that can’t work for a longer time
B、fisheries should keep the yield below 50% of the biomass
C、the ocean biomass should restored its original level.
D、people should adjust the fishing baseline to changing situation.
35、The author seems to be mainly concerned with most fisheries’
A、 management efficiency
B、 biomass level
C、 catch-size limits
D、 technological application.
做题方法同样，一般一个文章在15分钟之内做完。
32和35题是难题。其中32题难度是0.107.可怕都题，几乎没有人做对。主要都原因是对于“In some long-fished areas, it has halved again since then.
”没有读懂。可以看出，几乎每篇文章都有至少一两道难题。做错一个或两个都在正常范围内。
3、2007年真题
总评价：完型和作文难度大。老妖做了下完型，才得了5分。作文容易跑题，没有文字提示。跟2009年作文题的问题一样，太抽象。很多人有不同理解。
Text 2
For the past several years， the Sunday newspaper supplement Parade has featured a column called “Ask Marilyn.” People are invited to query Marilyn vos Savant， who at age 10 had tested at a mental level of someone about 23 years old； that gave her an IQ of 228-the highest score ever recorded. IQ tests ask you to complete verbal and visual analogies， to envision paper after it has been folded and cut， and to deduce numerical sequences， among other similar tasks. So it is a bit confusing when vos Savant fields such queries from the average Joe （whose IQ is 100） as， What's the difference between love and fondness？ Or what is the nature of luck and coincidence？ It's not obvious how the capacity to visualize objects and to figure out numerical patterns suits one to answer questions that have eluded some of the best poets and philosophers.
Clearly， intelligence encompasses more than a score on a test. Just what does it means to be smart？ How much of intelligence can be specified， and how much can we learn about it from neurology， genetics， computer science and other fields？
The defining term of intelligence in humans still seems to be the IQ score， even though IQ tests are not given as often as they used to be. The test comes primarily in two forms： the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and the Wechsler Intelligence Scales （both come in adult and children's version）。 Generally costing several hundred dollars， they are usually given only by psychologists， although variations of them populate bookstores and the World Wide Web. Superhigh scores like vos Savant’s are no longer possible， because scoring is now based on a statistical population distribution among age pecks， rather tan simply dividing the mental are by the chronological age and multiplying by 100. Other standardized tests， such as the Scholastic Assessment Test （SAT） and the Graduate Record Exam （GRE）， capture the main aspects of IQ tests.
Such standardized tests may not assess all the important elements necessary to succeed in school and in life， argues Robert J. Sternberg. In his article “How Intelligent Is Intelligence Testing？”。 Sternberg notes that traditional tests best assess analytical and verbal skills but fail to measure creativity and practical knowledge， components also critical to problem solving and life success. Moreover， IQ tests do not necessarily predict so well once populations or situations change. Research has found that IQ predicted leadership sills when the tests were given under low-stress conditions， but under high-stress conditions. IQ was negatively correlated with leadership-that is it predicted the opposite. Anyone who bas toiled through SAT will testify that test-taking skill also matters， whether it‘s knowing when to guess or what questions of skip.
[451 words]
26. Which of the following may be required in an intelligence test？
[A] Answering philosophical questions.
[B] Folding or cutting paper into different shapes.
[C] Telling the differences between certain concepts.
[D] Choosing words or graphs similar to the given ones.
27. What can be inferred about intelligence testing from Paragraph 3？
[A] People no longer use IQ scores as an indicator of intelligence.
[B] More versions of IQ tests are now available on the Internet.
[C] The test contents and formats for adults and children may be different.
[D] Scientists have defined the important elements of human intelligence.
28. People nowadays can no longer achieve IQ scores as high as vos Savant's because
[A] the scores are obtained through different computational procedures.
[B] creativity rather than analytical skills is emphasized now.
[C] vos Savant's case is an extreme one that will not repeat.
[D] the defining characteristic of IQ tests has changed.
29. We can conclude from the last paragraph that
[A] test scores may not be reliable indicators of one's ability
[B] IQ scores and SAT results are highly correlated.
[C] testing involves a lot of guesswork.
[D] traditional tests are out of date.
30. What is the author's attitude towards IQ tests？
[A] Supportive.
[B] Skeptical.
[C] Impartial.
[D] Biased.
首先介绍出题人的心里如何判断都问题。介绍解决方法如下（出自我弟这篇文章：英语70分之天龙八部篇的第二页：
照抄原文不是解(考研英语决不是中学考试,看到原文直接pass掉)
含义简单不是解(命题老师的出题点是文章中耐人寻味,有所启发的点,所以低级趣味的直接pass掉)
通常意义不是解(此陷阱为看不懂文章,而只比较四个答案的人而设,看上去最象的那个选项往往就是你最美丽的敌人)
具体的不是解(考研英语的文章都是来自于各大学术刊物,答案绝对不会是1+1=2,而是告诉你在什么前提下,1+1可以等于别的数,可以等于3,可以等于4 可以等于1000,而且答案往往是通过抽象推理得到的,需要借助你自己的概括抽象能力,总结出最象原文的那个答案,所以具体的,别犹豫,pass掉)
招式如下:
照抄原文不是解 VS 同义转换才是解
含义简单不是解 VS 含义深刻才是解
通常意义不是解 VS 作者观点才是解
具体的不是解 VS 抽象的才是解
谓之曰: 天龙八部....
其实,出题与答卷的过程就是一场心理的游戏,要想做对题,首先要知人心!
除了以上方法外，我补充一点，就是文章未提到的千万别选.
具体到我引都TEXT 3。其中28题要注意干扰项C是题干的简单重复，29题D out of date文章未提到。27题很多人做错。其实C就是所谓都抽象的才是解。
4、2008年真题
总评价，难度最低的一年。作文还加了中文释义，就是防止跑题。但是还有很多跑题。
Text 2
It used to be so straightforward. A team of researchers working together in the laboratory would submit the results of their research to a journal. A journal editor would then remove the authors’ names and affiliations from the paper and send it to their peers for review. Depending on the comments received, the editor would accept the paper for publication or decline it. Copyright rested with the journal publisher, and researchers seeking knowledge of the results would have to subscribe to the journal.
No longer. The Internet–and pressure from funding agencies, who are questioning why commercial publishers are making money from government-funded research by restricting access to it- is making access to scientific results a reality. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has just issued a report describing the far-reaching consequences of this. The report, by John Houghton of Victoria University in Australia and Graham Vickery of the OECD, makes heavy reading for publishers who have, so far, made handsome profits. But it goes further than that. It signals a change in what has, until now, been a key element of scientific endeavor.
The value of knowledge and the return on the public investment in research depends, in part, upon wide distribution and ready access. It is big business. In America, the core scientific publishing market is estimated at between $7 billion and $11 billion. The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers says that there are more than 2,000 publishers worldwide specializing in these subjects. They publish more than 1.2 million articles each year in some 16,000 journals.
This is now changing. According to the OECD report, some 75% of scholarly journals are now online. Entirely new business models are emerging; three main institutional subscribers pay for access to a collection of online journal titles through site-licensing agreements. There is open-access publishing, typically supported by asking the author (or his employer) to pay for the paper to be published. Finally, there are open-access archives, where organizations such as universities or international laboratories support institutional repositories. Other models exist that are hybrids of these three, such as delayed open-access, where journals allow only subscribers to read a paper for the first six months, before making it freely available to everyone who wishes to see it. All this could change the traditional form of the peer-review process, at least for the publication of papers.
26. In the first paragraph, the author discusses
[A] the background information of journal editing.
[B] the publication routine of laboratory reports.
[C] the relations of authors with journal publishers.
[D] the traditional process of journal publication.
27. Which of the following is true of the OECD report?
[A] It criticizes government-funded research.
[B] It introduces an effective means of publication.
[C] It upsets profit-making journal publishers.
[D] It benefits scientific research considerably.
28. According to the text, online publication is significant in that
[A] it provides an easier access to scientific results.
[B] it brings huge profits to scientific researchers.
[C] it emphasizes the crucial role of scientific knowledge.
[D] it facilitates public investment in scientific research.
29. With the open-access publishing model, the author of a paper is required to
[A] cover the cost of its publication.
[B] subscribe to the journal publishing it.
[C] allow other online journals to use it freely.
[D] complete the peer-review before submission.
30. Which of the following best summarizes the main idea of the passage?
[A] The Internet is posing a threat to publishers.
[B] A new mode of publication is emerging.
[C] Authors welcome the new channel for publication.
[D] Publication is rendered easier by online service.
老妖做这题26、27、28全错。主要因为是没弄明白出题人心里。因为出题人跟05、06、07还不一样。此外速度太快，大概8-10分钟就做完了。
26题的C选项文中没提到，我选了C，答案是D。27题C做法是同一转换才是解，我选了B,B错在effective没提到。28题C是根据the value of knowledge来做都干扰项。我选了A，被干扰后选了C。
4、2009年真题
总评价：完型、翻译很难。非常抽象，读两遍读不懂。作文容易跑题，虽然给了中文释义，但是很多人还是跑题了。作文第一篇很难。很多人做错。
Text 1
没有找到WORD，请见贴都照片。其中第一题是选B familiar 还是c mechanical有不同意见。先不说谁对谁错，在正式答案出来之前，说什么都没有意义。
只说，根据照抄原文不是解VS同义转换才是解来看，b是原文中familiar routine都简单照搬。这个题应该是问都routine转换后的意思，所以C比B要象正确答案。
六、具体考试时候做题顺序
可以先做做作文。大小作文40-50分钟写完最好，至少保证20分。然后做完型，注意第一印象最准，不要随便修改。（个人感觉写完作文最好做阅读，因为这个时候头脑还算很清醒，用清醒的头脑去做分值最多的题。并且很难保证做完完形填空后不会崩溃。）新题型至少10分钟，翻译至少20分钟。阅读60分钟。都是比较正常都时间分配。2009年翻译很难，概念非常抽象，估计翻译成中文，也没人看的懂。这时候就要学会放弃，先把阅读和新题型做好。翻译然后字对字翻译，保证基本分。笔者以前日常工作需要翻译一些晦涩都法律文件，实在不懂时候就采取这样都办法。翻译完后再根据法律原则和精神进行修改。
总之，说了那么多，最终还是要归结到做题上，了解出题人思路上来。此外作文尽量不要背模板，现在判卷子老师比较反感模板。而且有模板最大都坏处是，先入为主，容易跑题。最后介绍个什么作**通用的一句话，just as a coin hase two sides，事物都有两面性，政治讲矛盾就是这个道理。不管作文出什么的题，都有两面性。就比如2009的“远”和“近”。不明白这个道理，其实还是不适合做一个研究生的。
=========================================================================================
补充
英语阅读SCAN和SKIP的训练方法（老妖版）
这两种方法不是我先提出来的，其实是现代社会发展的必备的一项能力，只是咱们的填鸭式或素质教育均不强调这点。
我这个人是被填鸭式教育毒害下来的，不过还好我还知道自己反思。因为本性上比较叛逆，说白了，就是你让我干这个，我偏不爱干这个。
而你们这帮人是被所谓的素质角度毒害的，这种欺骗性更大，因为换汤不换药，本质上不是为了提高教学质量，而最终是归结到钱。
所以该具备的能力，其实我们都是欠缺的。所以必须去反省。
而现在这个社会是资讯发达的社会，信息量巨大。不跳读不扫读，无形中我们就落后于他人。毕竟我们的知识更多是靠后天学习来获得的。
那SCAN就是扫读，SKIP就是跳读了。
本质上这两种阅读方法，每个人每天都在用。
比如你每天都要看报纸，不可能每个版面每个字都要看到。那我们首先看一下重点在哪里，比较感兴趣的新闻在哪个版面，我们就会直接翻到那个版面，这就是SKIP. 那我们读这个感兴趣的文章的时候，我们不是每个字都读的，我们是那眼睛快速的扫里面有用的信息的，这就是SCAN。
但为什么我们阅读英语的时候不会SCAN和SKIP呢？
一是因为老师没讲过，特别是那些非英语专业的。二是因为我们不会，或者说不敢。特别是当考研做到英语的时候，那么重要的卷子，谁敢呢？
那么我告诉你，即使老师没讲过，我自己就去自学过。而且我敢在考研的时候，英语每篇阅读里，至少有3-4句完整的句子我是一点没看过的。
那么首先要解决的是为什么考研英语就特别需要这两个能力呢？解决了这个问题，我们才能谈到训练方法。
因为考研的英语阅读量太大了。就象特别纪念版的法律晚报，里面还没有任何的不用看的广告。要在3个小时内做完，还要检查一遍，几乎是不可能的。
因为个人感觉，几乎80%左右的人是没有检查时间的。很可能这个比例还要高。所以特别需要能提高阅读速度的方法。那么快速阅读最管用，也最常用的两种方法就是SCAN和SKIP了。
那么我们如何训练这两个能力呢？方法有二。
一、SCAN和SKIP是有专门的书来训练的，一般考研书店没有，得去北外的书店找找看。就在北京外国语学院的书店里就有卖的。要买全英文版的。里面的方法其实很笨，比如给一个长句，里面有一个比较特别重要的词汇，让你看完后，找到跟它意思相近的词汇。当然这不是普通的找同义词，因为只让你看一遍句子，不允许回视。
二、此外，还有一种办法来强制训练，这种是老妖看完上面那种书以后自己找的方法。理论基础就在于咱们看中文，其实就是扫读和跳读的，比如看报纸，相信没人会把报纸上每个字都看过吧，但其实了解的信息量跟精读是差不多的。所以在理论上，这两种方法我们都会，看英文我们也应该能达到这种程度。强制训练的办法就是，定在规定时间内看完一篇文章。这个时间是一般精读看不完这篇文章的。逼的我们去扫读和跳读才能完成。比如15分钟才能一个字不拉第看完一篇阅读。那你不管如何，一定要在10分钟内过一遍。注意这10分钟内，我们不可能全部所有字都看一遍的，有些我们必须是跳过不阅读的，有些是必须扫一眼就过的。强迫自己用这两种方法去看文章。
我就是这么练出来的，因为世界上的信息很多都是垃圾，我们的时间宝贵，怎么能浪费在垃圾身上呢。那更多的信息是用英语写的，那其实更多的是英语垃圾信息。那我们更应该去扫去跳了。因为垃圾太多了，没必要去浪费时间。说白了，考研英语阅读就是垃圾，因为你考过后，没有人再会去看那些东西。不是垃圾是什么？对待垃圾难道还要去一遍遍的仔细翻吗？2009年那篇英语翻译，那不是垃圾是什么？估计翻译成中文没人看得懂吧。呵呵~~~
那种全文版的看看就行了，其他还是更多要靠老妖说的需自宫版，就是必须断了自己后路，强迫自己去跳去扫。除了这两个办法，没有任何办法能保证时间到的时候能正好看到最后一句。
只有会了这两种方法，英语才有可能上70，这也是为什么英语专业的考生容易上70的原因，因为他们大学里开设有这种专门训练快速阅读的课程。 |
楼主